In the video titled “Woman Accused of Forging Signature on Birth Certificate (Full Episode) | Paternity Court”, a man named Andrews and his mother are in court, suing his ex, Ms. Corbitt, for paternity fraud. Andrews claims that Ms. Corbitt forged his signature on the birth certificate of her five-month-old son, Quinn Andrews Jr., who he believes is not his biological son. Ms. Corbitt, on the other hand, argues that Andrews is doubting their son because he does not want to be a responsible adult and because his mother is meddling.
Judge Lake, the presiding authority, sets the stage, “Mr. Andrews, you and your mother are in court today suing your ex, Ms. Corbitt for paternity fraud, because you claim she forged your signature on the birth certificate of her five month old son Quinn Andrews Jr. Who you believe is not your biological son, is that correct?”
Andrews insists that he did not sign anything and yet his name appeared on the birth certificate. He recounts the day of the birth, stating that he cut the umbilical cord, requested a blood test, and stayed at the hospital for 24 hours. He left the following day to retrieve a car seat and claims he did not sign anything. He believes that someone else put his name on the birth certificate.
Ms. Corbitt, however, has a different perspective. She asserts that Mr. Andrews is merely trying to evade responsibility. Judge Lake addresses her, “Miss Corbitt, you say, Mr. Andrews is doubting your son because he does not want to be a responsible adult and because he has a meddling mother, is that correct?”
The allegations are serious, and the evidence seems to pile up. Mr. Andrews’ mother is adamant about her son’s innocence, “I told my son not to sign a birth certificate until he gets the blood test to prove that that is his child.”
Mr. Andrews himself presents his case, “I found an empty Magnum wrapper under the sofa, which she claimed was mine, which it wasn’t, ’cause all of ’em we use, I throw away.” He continues, “I found messages on her phone, where some guys were telling her, ‘Leave the back door open and be naked when I arrive.'”
The relationship between Andrews and Ms. Corbitt is described as tumultuous, with Andrews accusing Ms. Corbitt of sleeping around with everyone in their neighborhood. Ms. Corbitt denies these allegations and insists that Andrews is the father of her child.
Ms. Corbitt, however, remains steadfast in her claim, “Quinn was the only person that I was sleeping with unprotected. Point blank. Period.”
The case reaches its climax as Judge Lake delivers the verdict, “In the case of Andrews v. Corbitt, when it comes to five month old, Quinn Andrews Jr., it has been determined by this court… Mr. Andrews, you… are the father.”
Despite these doubts, Andrews has spent time with Quinn Jr. and has developed a relationship with him. However, he maintains his belief that he is not the biological father.
The video concludes with the results of a DNA test, which confirms that Andrews is indeed the biological father of Quinn Jr. The judge urges both parties to focus on raising their child and to take advantage of counseling and resources.
