In this episode, a case involving Ms. Mangram and Ms. Schools is presented. Ms. Mangram lost her son to a violent crime and claims that Ms. Schools is falsely claiming her deceased son as the father of her child. Ms. Schools insists that Mr. Mangram is the father and plans to prove it to his family.
Ms. Mangram explains that she found out about Ms. Schools’ pregnancy when she approached her at the hospital after her son was shot. Ms. Schools, however, says that she informed Ms. Mangram through Facebook. The speaker is describing a situation where they went to visit someone in the hospital. They tried to contact the person through Facebook but did not receive a response. They then went to the hospital and saw the person hooked up to machines. The speaker sat next to the person and cried. There is some confusion about whether the person received the message on Facebook or not.
One of the speakers in the video states, “’cause I’m like, ‘This is not right.’ And I told her that day that this is not right.” This quote reflects the emotional turmoil and confusion that the speaker is experiencing.
The speaker explains that they did not know how to contact anyone else and that they wrote a message on Facebook because they did not know what else to do. The speaker is expressing disbelief and indifference towards someone claiming to be pregnant with their baby. They mention that their son had told them about several girls who claimed to be pregnant by him, but they only knew about two of them.
The speaker also mentions that they did not keep in touch with a person named Ms. Mangram and her family during the pregnancy. However, they did receive messages from them on Facebook and Ms. Mangram came to the hospital to see the speaker’s baby. The speaker denies that the baby looks like their son and mentions that they held the baby and looked at her hair. They conclude by saying that Ms. Mangram never told them anything.
The speaker is upset because someone is talking about the baby’s father. They did not want the baby to be his and they are tired of hearing about it. The speaker is emotional and does not want to be reminded of their son who is no longer here. The judge acknowledges the pain of losing a child and appreciates the speaker’s honesty.
The speaker is expressing their pain and difficulty in dealing with a significant loss in their life. They mention not wanting to be reminded of the person they lost and feeling tired of crying. The text also mentions a court case involving a beautiful baby girl named after the speaker’s deceased son. The speaker discusses their relationship with the baby’s father and the mother’s actions towards them.
The text is a conversation between multiple individuals discussing a paternity case. The speaker is addressing someone named Mr. Mangram and asking him to come to the witness stand. The judge then asks Mr. Mangram if it is true that he allowed the mother of the child to name the child after him. Mr. Mangram confirms this and explains that he accepted what his son told him. He also expresses that he wants to be involved in the situation, regardless of the outcome.
The text discusses a DNA test that was taken after the shooting of someone named Dominique. The person speaking believes that the test results are negative because Dominique had received multiple blood transfusions, which can alter DNA. They present evidence that the blood was drawn the day after Dominique passed away.
The speaker expresses their concern and research about the situation. The speaker found out that a blood transfusion can alter a paternity test. They told Ms. Venus about it and she initially agreed to do it again if it’s true. However, later on, she talked to scientists and others who told her it’s not true.
The speaker questions Ms. Schools about living with another man while being with her boyfriend and messing with Dominique at the same time. Ms. Schools clarifies that she stopped talking to her boyfriend and started talking to Dominique when her boyfriend moved out. The speaker also mentions that Ms. Schools told both of them that she was pregnant and her boyfriend wanted a DNA test.
Ms. Schools volunteered to do a DNA test when she was pregnant, but Dominique told her something. The doctor told the speaker that they needed to stick a needle in their stomach to get fluid around the baby, but the speaker decided to wait until they actually had the baby. The speaker mentions that the stories change, but DNA testing is absolute. The speaker and their wife have undergone independent testing, and the results will be revealed in court.
The judge announces that the 18-month-old child, Dominique Samai Mangram, is not related to Andre and Venus Mangram. In this text, a woman named Ms. Mangram is sobbing and expressing her knowledge of something. Judge Lake asks if she is okay and if she would like to sit down. Ms. Schools, another woman, confirms that she knows who her child’s father is. The judge questions Ms. Schools about whether she was sleeping with someone else, but she denies it. The judge tells Ms. Mangram that she can have a seat and expresses sympathy for her situation. The court is adjourned.
