This episode, part of the fourth season of the show, delves into a complex paternity dispute involving a woman named Miss Walton, a man named Mr. Cherry, and their 1-year-old son, Josiah.
The episode begins with a conversation between the judge, Miss Walton, and Mr. Cherry. Miss Walton claims that Mr. Cherry denies being the father of their son, Josiah, and their relationship is in jeopardy. She states, “Mr. Cherry denies being the father of our son, Josiah. Our relationship is in jeopardy because of this.” This statement sets the stage for the intense dispute that unfolds throughout the episode.
Mr. Cherry alleges that Miss Walton cheated on him with another man and he is certain that he is not the father. He asserts, “I believe Miss Walton cheated on me with another man. I am certain that I am not the father of Josiah.” This accusation adds another layer of complexity to the dispute, raising questions about trust and fidelity in their relationship.
Miss Walton explains that she wants a DNA test to prove that Mr. Cherry is the father because he has been treating Josiah differently than their other children. She says, “I want a DNA test to prove that Mr. Cherry is the father. He has been treating Josiah differently than our other children.” This statement highlights the emotional toll that the dispute is taking on their family, particularly on their young son, Josiah.
The judge acknowledges that the situation is difficult and the stakes are high. The judge’s acknowledgement underscores the seriousness of the situation and the potential consequences for all parties involved.
Mr. Cherry admits to having doubts and accuses Miss Walton of lying throughout their relationship. He says, “I have doubts about being the father. I believe Miss Walton has been lying throughout our relationship.” His statement reveals his feelings of betrayal and mistrust, further complicating the dispute.
Miss Walton denies these accusations. Her denial adds to the tension in the room, as it contradicts Mr. Cherry’s claims and raises questions about who is telling the truth.
They discuss their nine-year relationship, which has been on and off and rocky. They have known each other since high school and have deep feelings for each other. However, throughout the relationship, there have been lies and cheating. This discussion provides a glimpse into the complexities of their relationship and the challenges they have faced over the years.
Miss Walton admits to cheating on her partner first, and then her partner cheated as well. She explains, “I admit to cheating on Mr. Cherry first. He started cheating when he didn’t get attention from me or when I didn’t do what he wanted.” Her admission reveals the cycle of infidelity in their relationship, which has contributed to their current dispute.
She also mentions that he is controlling and looks for attention elsewhere. When he started looking for attention elsewhere, she also cheated. This statement provides insight into the dynamics of their relationship and the factors that led to their infidelity.
Miss Walton claims that it is not possible for Josiah to be the son of her ex-boyfriend because she used protection with her ex-boyfriend, but does not use protection with Mr. Cherry. She says, “It is not possible for Josiah to be the son of my ex-boyfriend. I used protection with my ex-boyfriend, but I do not use protection with Mr. Cherry.” This claim raises questions about the timeline of their relationships and the paternity of Josiah.
However, the dates and timeline of their relationships do not add up, leading to doubt about the paternity of Josiah. The judge and Mr. Cherry express their skepticism, and Miss Walton admits to sleeping with other people while in a relationship with Mr. Cherry, further raising doubts about paternity.
In the end, the judge announces the DNA test results, confirming that Mr. Cherry is the biological father. The speaker expresses remorse for causing trauma and suggests that both parties should focus on their mental and emotional health. The speaker says, “I express remorse for causing trauma. Both parties should focus on their mental and emotional health.” The speaker also expresses a desire to understand and empathize with the pain of someone else and mentions sending ashes and clothes.
